Was just reading the post on HST summed up over on lyle's website. Just to understand where im coming from this is a quick excerpt from part of the conversation (Im sure lots of you already read it ages ago but anyway):
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">LYLE: Argubaly the biggest difference in what I wrote 3 years and ago and now has to do with RBE. I am no longer convinced that 7-10 days off does jack squat in terms of affecting it. I sort of alluded to that in the original piece, research shows that RBE is still significant 6 weeks-6 months down the road. Doesn't mean that time off, or a week of light training isn't a damn good idea, especially after heavy negatives, but I doubt it's really detraining the muscle in terms of the RBE very much.
As well, and a lot of people have apparently come to this conclusion already, starting at too submax a weight so that you can add weight every workout doesn't work becuase the initial few workouits are too light to accomplish anything. Many seem to be starting at a higher %age (80% of previous best) and simply repeating the same weight more than once w/in a 2 week mini-cycle.
The idea that you have to increase load at every workout to grow is simply incorrect.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">DAN: Just to add a bit on RBE, having a change of heart I tend to agree with Lyle, 7 to 10 days off is probably only good for taking a break. It surely doesn't impact satellite cell, domain size, myosin composition or other fiber related physiological index. 30 days, that's another story.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">LYLE: But who is going to take a 30 day break? It's hard enough to get OCD athletes/bodybuilders to take time easy, much less not train for a month.
As well, any advantage has to be weighed against the huge amount of detraining that will occur.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">DAN: Huge is a pretty relative term and it's not as huge as most think. Several studies looking at detraining from 90 days to 31 weeks and even longer, show little isometric/dynamic strength loss (~8%), CSA loss isn't all that great either. Naturally this depends greatly on the length, subject training status and age.</div>
Okkkkkkk.
So in light of all this i was wondering if anyone here had ever taken around a month off from training for whatever reason and how this affected their gains in muscle mass or strength? Or even if they did lose some of both, did it result in the gains coming much faster when they started training up again in a way that more than made up for anything lost?
Im not the kind of lifter that near dies at the idea of not training, so i would easily be able to take off that amount of time if it resulted in my gains coming faster so this makes me wonder.
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">LYLE: Argubaly the biggest difference in what I wrote 3 years and ago and now has to do with RBE. I am no longer convinced that 7-10 days off does jack squat in terms of affecting it. I sort of alluded to that in the original piece, research shows that RBE is still significant 6 weeks-6 months down the road. Doesn't mean that time off, or a week of light training isn't a damn good idea, especially after heavy negatives, but I doubt it's really detraining the muscle in terms of the RBE very much.
As well, and a lot of people have apparently come to this conclusion already, starting at too submax a weight so that you can add weight every workout doesn't work becuase the initial few workouits are too light to accomplish anything. Many seem to be starting at a higher %age (80% of previous best) and simply repeating the same weight more than once w/in a 2 week mini-cycle.
The idea that you have to increase load at every workout to grow is simply incorrect.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">DAN: Just to add a bit on RBE, having a change of heart I tend to agree with Lyle, 7 to 10 days off is probably only good for taking a break. It surely doesn't impact satellite cell, domain size, myosin composition or other fiber related physiological index. 30 days, that's another story.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">LYLE: But who is going to take a 30 day break? It's hard enough to get OCD athletes/bodybuilders to take time easy, much less not train for a month.
As well, any advantage has to be weighed against the huge amount of detraining that will occur.</div>
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">DAN: Huge is a pretty relative term and it's not as huge as most think. Several studies looking at detraining from 90 days to 31 weeks and even longer, show little isometric/dynamic strength loss (~8%), CSA loss isn't all that great either. Naturally this depends greatly on the length, subject training status and age.</div>
Okkkkkkk.

So in light of all this i was wondering if anyone here had ever taken around a month off from training for whatever reason and how this affected their gains in muscle mass or strength? Or even if they did lose some of both, did it result in the gains coming much faster when they started training up again in a way that more than made up for anything lost?
Im not the kind of lifter that near dies at the idea of not training, so i would easily be able to take off that amount of time if it resulted in my gains coming faster so this makes me wonder.
