Search results

it will pass. I also throw out about aything with a verbal food record, especially a phone journal. We looked at our journals last year and there was a 100% error rate in some.

i could make the argument that a pre-WO dose will top off stores quicker per higher uptake than taking it whenever but this makes the nth degree difference at the end of the day.

With such a a small study (n=10, split in two trials) and only a bi-weekly analysis of food intake (per phone mind you). I can't give too much credence to this work. Also seems to be no controls for training variables other than they did an "x" program. Do note that this work goes...

Do note as you gain weight your maintenance kcal will increase as well. For the rest......what dkm said.

Regardless this is what the research says. You could further point out that you actually dying early from your size is either 100% or 0%. Life expectancy is a aggregate of many, many stats not just weight. Case study: How many 80 year old 250 pound people do you see?

.

Exactly. I find most folks who have a sedentary job and don't do a lot of "other" daily activity have a non-exercise maintenance around 8-9kcal # BW. About 11-12 with exercise in there. This changes with a host of factors as well.

A natural BB who is in decent shape will rarely have a BMI over 30. Contest condition you can drop this to about 25, if not lower. A true NAtural BB friend of mine goes about 220 in the offseason at 6'3 and down to 190 for contests as a point of reference.

Here are the choices for stalled weight loss: 1. Eat less 2. Move more 3. Eat at maintenance for 1-2 weeks, try again. A refeed scheme can maybe milk about an extra 1-2 weeks out of a cutting cycle before leptin and other adaptations start winning out over lypolysis. At 14% BF a refeed may...

You are just "big-boned" :)

What is "effective" protein?

1. It would be nearly impossible to do a human study to account for activity and BMR and for it to be longitudinal (way too many controls to look at) 2. UCP theory is gaining more support versus CR 3. Body weight regardless of kcal's is above and beyond the premier marker for longevity.

I agree with dkm. Refeeds take longer to have a positive effect on things like leptin and need to be more frequent as one becomes leaner. This is why silly things like carb cycling do not work as they are outlined. A large carb-based meal will do diddly poo in the grand scheme of hormonal...

Nabisco gets away with being labeled as TFA free in that it only has .5g serving, any macronutrient can be considered "x" free at that unit in the U.S. Triscuits were also reduced in serving size to reduce the fat content and calories.

Unless you are a vegetarian ultra marathoner or an underfed pr0n star there is little need for additional Zn above RDA. Sonny, Please don't start to throw out some Conte references at this point.

Just keep eating Mullet and you will be fine. MULLET 0.05 NA ND 0.13 191 :D

If you do a search on the site this is the number extrapolated from the mercury data. IIRC .17 per can with a weekly limit of 1.00 rings a very faint bell.

You would want the opposite actually. For an HST cycle it would be more feasible to have more carbs as workloads are higher (15's) as workload decreases (5's)energy needs would be lower (less carbs). Lyle's rationale was that 100g CHO/day are needed for a more appropriate hormonal mileau for...

At the least it probably helped you stay on your diet (i.e worked for you). Your weight loss is calories in versus calories out ;bottomline. Problem with cutting and frequent meals is that the "meals" are total teases. For a lot of folks 3-4 meals atleast satiate hunger better...

Correct. A lot of this is even further ameliorated with protein powders and other top-quality proteins.